Cit vs surinder pal anand

Author: wayv

August undefined, 2024

WebEven otherwise, this view of ours is supported by Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2011] 242 CTR 61 (P&H), wherein the ratio laid down is that where assessment being made us 44AB of the Act, assessee is not under obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the banks unless such entries ... WebAug 29, 2015 · CIT V. Surinder Pal Anand [2010]192Taxman264(P. &H.) Under section 44AD when the books of account were not maintained, income has to be estimated only at 8 per cent. Hence, estimating the income at 8 per cent cannot be regarded as illegal. Commissioner of Gift-tax v. A.Vajjiram& Bros.[2010] 326 ITR 551(MAD.)

Smt.S.Sakunthala Sivam vs Income Tax Officer on 28 March, 2024

Webi) CIT v/s Surinder Pal Anand, Surinder Pal Anand, [2011] 242 CTR 0061 (P&H HC) Assessment being made under s. 44AD, the assessee was not under obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the bank unless such entry had no nexus with the gross receipts and therefore no addition under s. 68 was called for. WebJan 30, 2024 · i) CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264 (P&H HC) ii) Nand Lal Popli vs. DCIT [ITA1161&1162/Chd/2013 dt. 14/06/2016] Accordingly the addition of Rs. 27,94,306/- u/s. 68/69A was directed to be deleted. The view full text of the judgment: Click here --------------------------------- Summarized by: CA. Shashank A. Mehta florida gators outdoor flag

Asking to prove 92% of expense defeats purpose of …

WebThe Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows'.- 8 I.T.A. No. 451/Coch/2024 "7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. WebJan 3, 2024 · The findings of ld Revisional Authority cannot be sustained as the enquiry in to the relevant issues is duly reflected in the assessment proceedings and only because the ld Pr. CIT being a higher authority and more wiser in experience considered that enquiry in some other aspects would have resulted in different opinion, does not give … WebSep 19, 2024 · The Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), under identical circumstances had held as follows’.-“7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. Sub-section (1) of section 44AD clearly provides that where an assessce is engaged in the business of civil ... florida gators party decorations

Cit vs surinder pal anand

Shri Ankit Shankarlal Tanwani, ... vs Assistanat Commissioner Of

WebJun 29, 2010 · CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand {2010} 192 Taxmann 264 {Punjab & Haryana} case, it is held that when income is estimated u/s 44AE, the ass... Jayesh N Barad v. …

Did you know?

WebPunjab and Haryana High court distinguished and overruled its own decision in CIT v. Surinder Pal Anand 48 DTR 135 in which cash deposited in bank was held from business itself. The provisions of presumptive taxation are enacted to facilitate computation of total income and filing of return of income. WebAgainst this decision, the Pal defendant as well as the plaintiffs have appealed to this Court the Pal defendants in Appeal No. 2587 of 1926 and the plaintiffs in Appeal No. 229 of …

WebJan 4, 1994 · v. Surinder Pal Anand . ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act” … WebSurinder Pal Anand, 242 CTR 61(P&H). 6. Ld D.R. on the other hand, relied on the order of the CIT(A). 7. of lower authorities and materials available on record. In the instant case, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee has made cash deposit of ₹20,67,668/- …

Webdecision of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT Vs Surinder Pal Anand 192 Taxmann 264 and submitted that once the return of income is filed U/s 44AD of the Act, the turnover declared by the assessee cannot be doubted. The assessee is not required to explain each WebSep 19, 2024 · Punjab and Haryana High court distinguished and overruled its own decision in CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand 48 DTR 135 in which cash deposited in bank was held from business itself.

WebThe CIT(A) upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of initial payment of installment of vend allotted, initial investment in the infrastructure in purchase of …

WebSep 13, 2024 · Surinder Pal Anand (2010) 192 Taxman 264 (P&H ) The assessee filed his return of income showing certain business income under section 44AD. The Assessing Officer did not accept the return and made an addition in respect of the cash deposited in the bank account during the year. great wall gear boxWebJul 4, 2024 · Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 Taxman 264, wherein in Para 8 it was stated that- once under a special provision , exemption from maintaining books is provided and rate of 8% of gross receipts... florida gators on cincinnati bengalsWebSep 11, 2024 · The Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surinder Pal Anand [2010] 192 taxmann 264), had held as follows:- “7. Section 44AD of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1994. florida gators outside cushionWebCommissioner Of Income Tax-Ii vs Gurinder Pal Singh on 25 March, 2013 User Queries cash deposit furniture mandi gobindgarh 44af section 44af cash deposit in bank 44ad 2015 july withdrawal from bank surinder pal anand Try out our Premium Memberservices: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Serviceand an ad-free experience. great wall gearhart oregonWebMar 14, 2024 · Surinder Pal Anand 192 Taxman 264 for the preposition that once the exemption from maintaining books of account has been provided under the special provision and presumptive tax @ 8% has been made the basis for determining taxable income, the assessee was not under any obligation to explain individual entry of cash deposit in the … great wall gearhartWebJun 29, 2010 · Case Name : CIT Vs. Surinder Pal Anand (Punjab & Haryana High Court) Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 156 of 2010. Date of Judgement/Order : … great wall georgetown sc menuWebThe Commissioner Of Income Tax vs P.V.Kalyanasundaram on 8 February, 2006. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08/02/2006 Coram THE … great wall georgetown sc